Evaluation of water ecologically civilized city construction

ZHANG Wenjie; YUE Qimeng; WEN Heqing; LLU Muxing; XU Xinyi; TIAN Pei

doi:10.12202/j.0476-0301.2020128

Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science) > 2020 > 56(2): 315-323. > DOI: 10.12202/j.0476-0301.2020128

ZHANG Wenjie, YUE Qimeng, WEN Heqing, LLU Muxing, XU Xinyi, TIAN Pei. Evaluation of water ecologically civilized city construction[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science), 2020, 56(2): 315-323. DOI: 10.12202/j.0476-0301.2020128

Citation:

PDF (910 KB)

Evaluation of water ecologically civilized city construction

ZHANG Wenjie^{1, 2},
YUE Qimeng^{1, 2},
WEN Heqing^{1, 2},
LLU Muxing³,
XU Xinyi^{1, 2, ,},
TIAN Pei^{1, 2}

1.
Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province, 430079, Wuhan, Hubei, China
2.
College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, 430079, Wuhan, Hubei, China
3.
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, 100875, Beijing, China

More Information

Received Date: March 19, 2020
Available Online: July 28, 2020

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In The 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China the "construction of ecological civilization" was proposed. The Ministry of Water Resources accordingly proposed construction of water ecological civilization in 2013. Construction of water ecologically civilized city has gradually become a focus in domestic research of water resources management, evaluation methods and index systems are being developed continuously. Subjective weighting methods such as analytic hierarchy process, Delphi method, principal-component analysis method are used for evaluation. Entropy method has been widely used in ecological evaluation in recent years because of its objectivity and solid scientific basis. Application of subjective weighting method and entropy method were compared here in the evaluation of construction of aquatic ecologically civilized cities. Application and advantages of first-level indicators were discussed, feasibility of entropy method in evaluation of construction of aquatic ecological civilization cities was discussed. Total construction scores of water ecologically civilized cities in the Yangtze River Delta city group, Chengdu-Chongqing city group and the middle reaches of the Yangtze River we found to be 0.584 6, 0.485 2 and 0.556 6 respectively. Construction of aquatic ecological civilization in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration and urban agglomeration the middle reaches of the Yangtze River was found to be significantly better than in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration. The evaluation was essentially consistent with current level of aquatic ecological civilization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt urban agglomeration, being feasible for evaluation of aquatic ecologically civilized cities.
- water ecological civilization,
- entropy method,
- Yangtze River Economic Zone,
- urban agglomeration,
- evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References (28)

References

[1]	左其亭. 水资源适应性利用理论及其在治水实践中的应用前景[J]. 南水北调与水利科技,2017,15(1):18
[2]	李晶. 我国水生态文明城市建设的政策构想与初步探索[J]. 水利发展研究,2013,13(6):1 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1408.2013.06.001
[3]	赵雪霞, 于鲁冀, 王燕鹏. 清潩河流域(许昌段)水生态环境功能分区指标体系构建[J]. 水利水电技术,2018,49(9):162
[4]	续会勇, 谢悦波, 蒋艳君, 等. 基于改进ANP方法的新沂市水生态文明城市评价[J]. 水电能源科学,2017,35(3):49
[5]	董浩, 范天雨, 田振兴, 等. 基于Delphi专家法的南水北调工程运行安全风险因子优选[J]. 项目管理技术,2017,15(7):14 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4313.2017.07.002
[6]	徐玢玢. 基于熵值法的我国区域创新能力评价研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳工业大学, 2013
[7]	杜娟娟. 基于熵值法的山西省水资源脆弱性模糊综合评价[J]. 水资源开发与管理,2018(9):50
[8]	刘怡, 高巍, 朱家明. 基于熵值法对水资源现状的评价和灰色预测[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(自然科学版),2019,35(3):88
[9]	郝小宇, 张鑫, 雍志勤. 榆林市水资源承载力空间分异[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2019,37(12):1037
[10]	WANG T. Study on evaluation system for water ecological civilization of cross-border river cities in China[J]. Revista de la Facultad de Ingenieria,2017,32(6):251
[11]	TIAN M, WANG T, YU S. Study on the evaluation of water ecological civilization: a case of cities in the Pearl River Delta Region of China[J].International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering , 2016,9(4):1689
[12]	林泽阳, 林建华. 一种基于盲数的主观赋权法研究[J]. 计算机与数字工程,2015,43(6):1073 doi: 10.3969/j.issn1672-9722.2015.06.030
[13]	孙铭忆. 层次分析法(AHP)与网络层次分析法(ANP)的比较[J]. 中外企业家,2014(10):67 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8772.2014.10.029
[14]	贺纯纯, 王应明. 网络层次分析法研究述评[J]. 科技管理研究,2014(3):204 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2014.03.042
[15]	LUO Y Y, WANG Z, CHEN Y, et al. Eco-Cycle Comprehensive operation performance evaluation: a case study of Baotou Steel Group[C]// XU J, GEN M, HAJIYEV A, et al .Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (ICMSEM 2017).Springer, Cham: Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering, 2018
[16]	LIJUN LI. Effect of rural power grid construction evaluation based on entropy method[C]//Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Modeling, Simulation, Optimization and Numerical Techniques(SMONT 2019). Science and Engineering Research Center, 2019
[17]	刘玒玒, 汪妮, 解建仓, 等. 基于熵权法的城市生态系统健康模糊评价[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版),2014,47(6):755
[18]	孙国营, 陕振沛, 孙新杰,等. 基于TOPSIS-灰色关联方法的水资源配置评价模型研究[J]. 节水灌溉,2019(7):68 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4929.2019.07.014
[19]	姜北, 孙美, 纪玉琨, 等. 基于熵值法的地表水水质模糊综合评价[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2018,37(增刊1):47
[20]	王菲, 廖静, 茅丹俊, 等. 中国典型河湖水体铅的水生生物安全基准与生态风险评价[J]. 生态毒理学报,2017,12(3):434
[21]	任源鑫, 张海宁, 周旗, 等. 宝鸡市水资源脆弱性评价[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,2019,30(3):119
[22]	王爱霞, 曹新光, 张朋飞, 等. 基于改进的模糊综合评价法对黄州区遗爱湖的水质研究[J]. 广西师范学院学报(自然科学版),2018,35(1):53
[23]	苏德林, 武斌, 沈晋. 水环境质量评价中的层次分析法[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,1997(5):108
[24]	MARDLE S, PASCOE S, HERRERO I. Management objective importance in fisheries: an evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)[J]. Environmental Management,2004,33(1):1 doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-3070-y
[25]	LIU Z, CHEN J, CHEN D, et al. Evaluation system of water ecological civilization of irrigation area in China[C]// Iop Conference Series: Earth & Environmental Science. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2016.
[26]	YASSER M, HOSSEIN B, ZAHRA S A. Extension of Fuzzy Delphi AHP based on interval-valued Fuzzy sets and its application in water resource rating problems[J]. Water Resources Management,2016,30(9):3123
[27]	DING H J, LIU J T, YUAN G X. Establishment of the evaluation index system on the water ecological civilation construction in Lianhua county of Jiangxi province[J]. Jiangxi Hydraulic Science & Technology,2014,8(3):167
[28]	段学军, 虞孝感, 邹辉. 长江经济带开发构想与发展态势[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(10):1621 doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201510001

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(16)

1.	姚雅婷，司振江. 哈尔滨市水生态文明评价. 水利科学与寒区工程. 2025(01): 58-62 .
2.	施洋. 抚顺市水生态文明建设水平评价. 水土保持应用技术. 2025(01): 27-29 .
3.	高凡. 辽宁省水生态文明时空变化特征研究. 水利科学与寒区工程. 2025(05): 79-83 .
4.	张俊，冯越珺，尤赟. 黄河流域水生态文明建设水平的时空格局及空间收敛性. 华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版). 2024(02): 18-32+44 .
5.	张胜武，葛宇梦，韩日. 新型城镇化与水生态文明建设的动态关系研究——以淮河生态经济带为例. 阜阳师范大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(01): 13-20 .
6.	唐世旺，吴泽俊. 基于CRITIC-TOPSIS模型的江西省水生态文明评价. 南昌工程学院学报. 2023(02): 97-102 .
7.	张胜武，黄超群，李小胜，刘海猛. 淮河生态经济带水生态文明发展水平的时空格局演变及收敛性研究. 长江流域资源与环境. 2023(10): 2158-2172 .
8.	叶昌龙，殷江滨，王紫璇，南瑜睿. 煤炭资源枯竭型城市转型绩效与障碍因子. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(06): 84-96 .
9.	岳江，王红霞，王馨茹，王小兰，郭伟. 山西省7条河的流域水生态承载力评估. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文). 2023(06): 1235-1248 .
10.	张俊，冯越珺，尤赟. 黄河流域水生态文明建设水平的时空分异及影响因素. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(05): 41-51 .
11.	李丽丽，陈雯雯，李东风. 长三角城市群水生态文明建设水平及其时空分异. 环境污染与防治. 2022(04): 546-551 .
12.	李千珣，郭生练，邓乐乐，田晶，王何予. 汉江流域水生态文明建设评价. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文). 2022(03): 498-505 .
13.	唐勇军，马欣钰，沈菊琴，冯明祥，秦科. 河湖长制推动东方市水生态文明建设进程的思考. 水利经济. 2022(06): 74-79+101+104-105 .
14.	万炳彤，鲍学英，赵建昌，李爱春. 区域水生态文明建设绩效评价及障碍诊断模型的建立与应用. 环境科学. 2021(04): 2089-2100 .
15.	苏聪文，邓宗兵，李莉萍，文江雪，曹宇芙. 中国水生态文明发展水平的空间格局及收敛性. 自然资源学报. 2021(05): 1282-1301 .
16.	岳启蒙，文倩，贺奕，田培，王纤阳，鱼京善，朱占亮. 水生态文明城市建设对城市水生态承载力的影响——以武汉市为例. 生态学报. 2021(14): 5586-5597 .

Other cited types(4)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (440) PDF downloads (16) Cited by(20)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Evaluation of water ecologically civilized city construction

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(16)

Other cited types(4)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Export File

Citation

Format

Content